The review is added beside the pick, never over it
Once a match has been played, its page gets a review. The published probability, the picked side and the reasoning stay exactly as they were. The page then holds both halves — what was expected and what happened — and that is the only arrangement in which either half is worth reading.
The first thing it says is whether the pick was right
Right or wrong, marked plainly at the top. There is no partial credit, and a miss is never re-framed as a near miss. That same mark is what feeds the published record.
Then what actually decided the match
A short account of how the match went and what mattered in it. The point of this part is that it can be held against the risks listed before the match: if the thing that decided it was already on that list, the pick was wrong for a reason we had seen coming, which is a different sort of failure from being caught out.
A right pick with bad reasoning is still worth reading
Picking the right side for the wrong reason happens, and the review says so when it does. Counting it as a hit is honest, because the record counts outcomes. Treating it as proof that the reasoning worked is not, and that is why the account matters as much as the mark.
Reviews come after the match, not the moment it ends
A finished match spends a while unreviewed before its review is written. Until then the page shows the original pick and no outcome. A missing review is a pending one, not a hidden one.
Read the reviews in bulk, not one at a time
One review explains one match. A run of them shows whether the same mistake keeps coming back — a map pool read wrong over and over, an adjustment for online play against LAN that is always too small. The archive is where they can be read together.
The review is why the number can be trusted or dismissed
Without reviews, an accuracy figure is just a number a site decided to show. With them, every entry behind the total has a page saying which match it was and how it went, and the figure can be argued with. How accuracy is measured sets out what goes into it.
What a review does not do
It does not revise the probability, pick the match again, or explain the result away. It records the outcome and what caused it. A review that argued the original pick had been right all along would make the whole exercise pointless.